Mark:

On 2024-01-06 11:52, Mark Filipak wrote:
Below is what I plan to submit to trac. I welcome comments and corrections. …

Good for you, digging into the details and specifics of how FFMpeg performs trims and concatenations.

But what I am missing here is a concise problem statement.

You say you plan to "submit to trac". Is this a bug report? Your message does not say that directly.

If it is a bug report, what is the bug title? It should be a concise (1-10 words) statement of what is incorrect.

What is the bug summary? It should a concise (1 paragraph) summary of the problem.

The example commands you give seem to be a pretty specific set of instructions for "how to reproduce".

What is the "observed behaviour"?  Is it something to do with the total number of packets in the "son" videos?  Or the frame number of the first non-black frame?

What is the "expected behaviour"?

What number of packets, or frame number, do you expect to see in each video?

Without these parts spelled out, a bug report is hard to reproduce, and hard to confirm as fixed.  That makes it more or less non-actionable. And I am guessing you are hoping to motivate action.

Also, what does "h:\BDMV\STREAM\00305.m2ts" refer to?  Is that a standard video which I can get a copy of somewhere? I don't see that you explain that. Without having the same source material as you, it is hard to reproduce the same results.

It may be that this test methodology reveals multiple bugs, which might be better pursued if reported separately.

Best regards,
     —Jim DeLaHunt


_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to