Mark:
On 2024-02-19 13:23, Mark Filipak wrote:
Best to create minimal reproducible usecase with all required files to
reproduce it, upload it somewhere and link it on ffmpeg trac site.
I did that. It didn't get any interest.
Really, you "did that"? I do not recall that you have created a (1)
minimal, (2) reproducible (3) usecase with (4) all required files to
reproduce it, and (5) said files uploaded somewhere accessible, and (6)
written an FFmepg Trac report, containing the (3) which is (1) and (2)
with links to (4) at (5).
If you think you have done that, can you please give us the URL of the
FFmepg Trac report and a report number?
Methinks it would be best for someone to confirm it before going to trac.
OK, so you have not actually "done that"? Can you at least point to an
email sent to the ffmpeg-user list with (1), (2), (3), (4), and (5)? The
best reference is to a URL of the message in the ffmpeg-user list
archives, but the exact Subject: and Date: lines of the message header
will do.
I do recall that you have claimed that you can reproduce a problem, but
you have not published a (3) description which is (2) reproducible by
others than yourself, and have not shared (4) the required files to
reproduce it, much less (5) somewhere accessible. Once others see the
description of usecase, they can advise you if it is (1) minimal.
I think that the lack of (1), (2), (3), (4), and (5) are one of the
obstacles to you making progress with this problem. It is one thing to
be unskilled at reading C code. It is another not to be able to produce
a reproducible usecase. I suggest you devote more effort to
communicating the reproducible usecase.
—Jim DeLaHunt
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
