On 6/17/2025 10:31 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 17/06/2025 13.27, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
Consider "Quod Gratis Asseritur, Gratis Negatur"* (or "What is
asserted without proof can be denied without proof.") It's your
assertion that "It would make sense to automatically decode to 16-bit
rgb444." You get to defend that.
I made no such assertion.
You did, and wrote it again-
I wrote: "It would make sense to automatically decode to 16-bit rgb444."
Yes or No?
If you had written "Would it make sense...", which forms a question, it
could be answered as a question; saying "It would make sense...." is an
assertion which must be defended against other peoples' questions. So
which is it, a question or an assertion?
On 6/17/2025 10:42 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
> On 17/06/2025 13.38, BloodMan wrote:
>> W dniu 2025-06-17 o 19:01, Mark Filipak pisze:
>> > That was not a 'Yes' or 'No' response.
>> there are questions that cannot be answered with "yes" or "no"... ;-)
> Why not?
Are you asking why are there questions that do not have binary answers?
Jump over to a rhetoric discussion forum for that. Or go study some
basic rhetoric, that might help.
z!
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
