On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 01:44, R P Herrold <[email protected]> wrote:
> No, I realize FHS and LSB are not King Canute, and the tide's path is clear. > I think mandating rather than optionally permitting use of a tmpfs, > however, is not a desireable approach As was pointed out here [1], it does not matter if it's a tmpfs or something else as long as it's writable very early during boot-up and does not mandate persistence across reboots. I wouldn't even mention tmpfs in the FHS as there is no need to do so. With that cleared up, do you agree to add /run to FHS? If yes, I can whip up a draft. Given the timeline, it's a good idea to move fast. Richard [1] http://bugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=718#c6 _______________________________________________ fhs-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
