On Mon, 9 May 2011, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] R P Herrold > > | If a given distribution ** wants ** the support load of NOT > | having enough info remaining persistent to diagnose state by > | simple inspection, on their head be it --- but we do not need > | to FORCE all to so suffer > > I think it makes sense to require applications to not assume that the > contents are persistent across reboots. This does not tie the hands of > distributions, but require that using a tmpfs (or similar) will work.
no objection here to adding such a caveat -- Russ herrold _______________________________________________ fhs-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
