On Thu, 12 May 2011 17:15:12 +0100 Jon Dowland <[email protected]> wrote:
> I haven't managed to find a statement of intent for this LHS revamp. > If the intention is for the LHS to be lean, consistent and entirely > rationalised; then it might make sense to get rid of the games > directories. OTOH, if it is designed to encapsulate current common > practice, then it doesn't make sense to get rid of them. Then again, they exist in part because the standard says they should (see fedora/debian games team discussions about this last month). [trim] > I would also ask: where do people want to go with the FHS, super-long > term? Do we want to get away from /usr? Do we want to start having > more meaningful names names (Apple-style /Applications, for example?) > And in that context, is removing contextually meaningful names like > the games directories a step forwards or backwards? Should we start a new thread for this? It would be a good thing to discuss separately of the games stuff. -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fhs-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
