On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 09:23, Steve Langasek <[email protected]> wrote:
> The wording can be improved, but I don't think it's ambiguous. "optional" > is used throughout the spec with the meaning "this is an optional component > of the system, but if present, this is where the component should be > located". Stating this explicitly can't hurt. > Nothing would be wrong with installing directly to /usr/share/[mygame], but > you're describing a normative change to the spec. I think a stronger > rationale is needed here for such a change than a post facto decision that > the current spec engages in "micro-management". The strong rationale is that it's arbitrary, inconsistent and would mean a _lot_ more new names would have to be introduced, as well. Richard _______________________________________________ fhs-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
