I just looked at the Polaroid 4000 and Canon scans of the Halloween slide, after reading that comment that the Polaroid didn't look much (or any) better than the Canon. One reason might be that the slide was inserted backwards in the Polaroid, so the emulsion side is facing the wrong way. Might this have some effect on the sharpness of the scan? Jim (who just bought a Polaroid and sure as hell HOPES that it is clearly better than the Canon....) ==================================================================== The filmscanners mailing list is hosted by http://www.halftone.co.uk To resign, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS in the title, or UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS_DIGEST if you are reading the Digest.
- Re: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scans Shawn Coggins
- Re: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scans bjs
- re[2]: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scans Alan Womack
- Re: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scans JimLevitt
- Re: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scans Melba's Mail
- Re: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scan... Rob Geraghty
- Re: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scan... Peter Besenbruch
- Re: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scan... Derek Clarke
- Emulsion Side (was Re: Group Scan site has pos... cjcronin
- re[2]: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scans Alan Womack
- RE: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scans jowilcox
- RE: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scans Hemingway, David J
- Re: Group Scan site has posted SS4000 scans bjs
- Update re "grain" testing Rob Geraghty