shAF wrote:
> Thanx ... but it sure is ugly!! ...*smile*...
That's because it's the raw unadjusted data.
>NKLS2000LS30_P_SDC.icm ..., and it looks damn good!!! ... ^but^ I am
>ending up with too much blue, and too little green in the neutral
>areas ... the gray border and the grayscale.
You'd need to ask Ed about that. I hadn't intended to imply that
the raw scan was useful for anything other than avoiding rescanning
the same film frame and archiving the raw data. That way as the
crop quality in Vuescan improves, you can recrop the original data
without digging up the film again.
The raw data won't have *any* colour adjustments, so it's bound to
look ugly and be difficult to adjust - especially if it's a scan
of a colour neg.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
====================================================================
The filmscanners mailing list is hosted by http://www.halftone.co.uk
To resign, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS in the
title, or UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS_DIGEST if you are reading the Digest.
