Don't know but will look into it but my comments were more related to
performance spec's. I would not think that the difference between SCSI I and
II would influence anyone decision on how well the scanner works for its
intended purpose. First I have to find where we state SCSI II.
David
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 4:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Scanner Testing and more (long)
> I know Polaroid is usually
> conservative in their specs,
Well, then why do they claim the SprintScan 4000 is a SCSI II
device, when it is only a SCSI I device? The SCSI chip that
they use is only capable of anynchronous transfers, and SCSI
II requires synchronous transfers. SCSI II uses the high density
D connector, and the SS4k uses the old Centronics style SCSI
I connector.
I have reported this 'mistake' to them a number of times, and
they seem not to care.
-----
Sent using MailStart.com ( http://MailStart.Com/welcome.html )
The FREE way to access your mailbox via any web browser, anywhere!
====================================================================
The filmscanners mailing list is hosted by http://www.halftone.co.uk
To resign, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS
in the title, or UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS_DIGEST if you are reading the
Digest.
====================================================================
The filmscanners mailing list is hosted by http://www.halftone.co.uk
To resign, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS in the
title, or UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS_DIGEST if you are reading the Digest.
