----- Original Message ----- From: "Clark Guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | I shudder (shudder!) to think what I'll need to stabilize my camera when I | get old! (er) | | Guy Clark | Why not stabilise your lenses? I was not an advocate of the Canon Image Stabilisation lenses, until I started to use one - EF 28-135 IS USM lens, it's fantastic! Bob Turner Dundee, Scotland, U.K. Website : www.bawbee.co.uk ==================================================================== The filmscanners mailing list is hosted by http://www.halftone.co.uk To resign, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS in the title, or UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS_DIGEST if you are reading the Digest.
- Image sharpness-- Hand Held vs. Tripod Mounted (wasR... Clark Guy
- Re: Image sharpness-- Hand Held vs. Tripod Moun... Tony Sleep
- Re: Image sharpness-- Hand Held vs. Tripod ... Ron Carlson
- Re: Image sharpness-- Hand Held vs. Tri... Tony Sleep
- Re: Image sharpness-- Hand Held vs.... Jeffrey Goggin
- RE: Image sharpness-- Hand Held vs.... John Hayward at Hopco
- RE: Image sharpness-- Hand Held vs. Tripod Moun... austin
- RE: Image sharpness-- Hand Held vs. Tripod Moun... Clark Guy
- RE: Image sharpness-- Hand Held vs. Tripod Moun... Clark Guy
- Microtek Artix 4000T Bob Turner
- Microtek Artix 4000T Robert Kehl
- Re: Microtek Artix 4000T Elroy Eckhardt
- RE: Microtek Artix 4000T Frank Paris
- Re: Microtek Artix 4000T Robert Kehl
- Re: Microtek Artix 4000T Elroy Eckhardt
- filmscanners: Re: Micr... NewLeaf Productions
- Re: filmscanners: Re: ... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Re: ... Jim Snyder
- Re: filmscanners: Re: ... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Re: ... Arthur Entlich