Austin Franklin wrote: > > This is absolutely correct. You can send the printer driver any resolution > you want, and it has to interpolate the data into halftone screens anyway. > If you do leave the box checked, and resize, you will then be double > interpolating the data...once in PS and once in the printer driver. I > would suggest not doing that, as it will, in almost all cases, degrade your > image. Just to prevent reinventing the wheel, is this based upon personal experience? My assumption would be different (since Photoshop does a wonderful resampling job, and many printer spoolers do not), but if you have already tested this, I'll take your work on it. If not, I might test the premise. Art
- RE: filmscanners: Re: monitors Frank Paris
- RE: filmscanners: Re: monitors Frank Paris
- filmscanners: Horizontal&Diagonal dot pitch Berry Ives
- RE: filmscanners: Horizontal&Diagonal dot pit... Frank Paris
- Re: filmscanners: Re: monitors Chris McBrien
- RE: Re[2]: filmscanners: Re: monitors Austin Franklin
- Re[4]: filmscanners: Re: monitors Guy Prince
- Re: Re[2]: filmscanners: Re: monitors Bill Ross
- Re: filmscanners: Re: monitors Arthur Entlich
- RE: Re[7]: filmscanners: Re: monitors Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Re: monitors Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Re: monitors Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Re: monitors Arthur Entlich
- RE: Re[7]: filmscanners: Re: monitors Austin Franklin
- RE: Re[7]: filmscanners: Re: monitors Laurie Solomon
- RE: Re[7]: filmscanners: Re: monitors Austin Franklin
- Re: Re[7]: filmscanners: Re: monitors Dana Trout
- filmscanners: decimation Frank Paris
- RE: filmscanners: Re: monitors Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Re: monitors Arthur Entlich
- RE: Re[7]: filmscanners: Re: monitors Austin Franklin