Dave,
I just happen to be the owner of both (well almost) of those scanners. I
have the older Dimage Scan Dual, which I was very happy with. The Kodak
scanner has been worth every penny that I paid for it, so far...
The scans from the Kodak are great. The software is kind of buggy at times;
I have to restart my computer every once in awhile, but the results have
been amazing for what I have been using it for. The software is a twain
interface, and I am able to do individual color corrections, levels, and
some sharpening with the software. I have not needed to do any color
correction in PS since I have used it. (I do do some touch-up, though). If
you would like, I could e-mail you some comparison jpgs off list, and if you
have any specific questions, don't hesitate to ask.
Spencer Stone
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 3:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: opinions kodak rfs 3600 scanner Vs Minolta dual
II
Wondering if we have any users of the new kodak rfs 3600. I had asked a few
weeks ago. Hopefully there are more in the pipeline by now. Looking for
opinions and or reviews. Have been holding back buying a scanner. The specs
look great for the money. But i'm leery about buying it without feedback
from
people who have actually used it. My second choice is the Minolta dimage
scan
dual II. Will be using it primaraly for negatives tri x b&w and misc color
negs. These are all hand held shots. Wondering how critical the resolution
difference between the two would be for larger prints. Any advice would be
most appreciated.
Dave Small
