>Are the 'jaggies' perhaps related to the bit depth???
I don't think so; I think they are related more to resolution than bit
depth. The more ppi or dpi ( depending on what technocratic dictionary that
you use) the fewer jaggies up to a point.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hersch Nitikman
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 12:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: LS30 Jaggies FYI
Are the 'jaggies' perhaps related to the bit depth???
Hersch
At 08:47 AM 01/08/2001 +1000, you wrote:
>FYI I finally got my computer reinstalled with everything running off the
>UDMA100 interface, so hard drive speed is no longer an issue. The jaggies
>are still there, so they certainly don't seem to be anything to do with
>CPU speed or hard drive speed. I know others have already said that, but
>I wanted to confirm it for myself all the same.
>
>So Nikonscan is still useless for me and I'm stuck with Vuescan. The LS30
>is running BIOS 1.3 and Nikonscan 2.51 - if anyone knows of more recent
>versions of either the BIOS or Nikonscan, let me know. The only reasons
>I'd like to use Nikonscan at all are - the convenience of TWAIN, some of
>the graphical tweaking tools, and ICE. I can live (and have lived) without
>Nikonscan, but it would be nice if it would work properly.
>
>Rob
>
>PS Ed, "stuck with vuescan" isn't such a bad thing given the advantages
>of 10bits per channel and no jaggies etc. :)
>
>
>Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://wordweb.com
