>Austin writes ... >> Yes, it appears you are confused about what DMax is. ... >> Second is the ability to discriminate within that voltage >> range, which is 'resolution'....and that is what DMax is. >> DMax is relative in and of itself. ... > And you have always been such a stickler for definitions. When did >Dmax (and Dmin) leave its proper context ... a property of the film >only? Scanners use DMax as part of their specs, which is what this whole discussion has been about. What's your point?
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bits? Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bi... Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bi... John D. Horton
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bi... shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bi... Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bi... shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bi... Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bi... shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bi... Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bi... Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bi... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bi... Bob Shomler
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bi... Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bi... Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's the bi... Tony Sleep