> But do some of you have the idea to switch to digital for
everyday
> photography? That would seem strange to me.
Yes, I do, as and when I can afford digital 3600x2400 pixel
frames, as I get from my scanner (probably in a decade or
so), because of..
1. immediacy of seeing a preview, so I can take it again if
I shook, someone moved, or I composed the shot wrongly;
2. the remarkable exposure latitude and low-light
sensitivity of the approx. 500 ukpound digital cameras I've
seen and borrowed;
3. time saving and improved quality control, cutting out the
processing & neg handling;
4. elimination of dust trouble;
5. cost (neglecting the initial capital outlay, which is too
much for me at the moment).
Alan T
----- Original Message -----
From: fotografia - tomasz zakrzewski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 1:56 PM
Subject: Odp: filmscanners: Nikon scanner selection
