"Tony Sleep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fuji recently launched a new version of the 400, which is supposed to be much better > than the previous stuff and now uses the same grain technology as the 100. I haven't > tried the new film, but the old was was dreadful. Is that the source of confusion? I was talking about Provia 400F not Provia 400. Rob
- Re: Provia 400F (Was filmscanners: orange mask) WRGill
- RE: Provia 400F (Was filmscanners: orange mask) Frank Paris
- RE: Provia 400F (Was filmscanners: orange mask) Rob Geraghty
- RE: Provia 400F (Was filmscanners: orange m... Frank Paris
- RE: Provia 400F (Was filmscanners: oran... Rob Geraghty
- RE: Provia 400F (Was filmscanners: oran... Tim Atherton
- RE: Provia 400F (Was filmscanners: orange mask) Tony Sleep
- Re: Provia 400F (Was filmscanners: orange m... Rob Geraghty
- Re: Provia 400F (Was filmscanners: orange mask) Mike Kersenbrock
- filmscanners: Re: Provia 400F Michael Wilkinson
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Provia 400F Mike Kersenbrock
- RE: filmscanners: Re: Provia 400F Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Provia 400F John Matturri
- Re: filmscanners: Re: Provia 400F Rob Geraghty