Same reply I received. Interestingly, the next day and today there is no evidence of the jaggies that were so obvious when I posted my query. It is not the power since I have everything connected to a UPS with line conditioning. Bill >Below is the response I received from Nikon USA to my email query about >whether they plan to fix Nikonscan to eliminate jaggies: >================= >Dear Rob Geraghty: > > If there are jaggies this is not something that is normal. I would >elect to send the scanner in for service. We have not found that this >happens with a lot of scanners. Please reference this case (number 2687) >if you have any further questions on this issue. > >Thank you for contacting Nikon, Inc. > >Sincerely, >Cal >Digital Imaging >Nikon, Inc.
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Frank Paris
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Robert Kehl
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real val... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real... Arthur Entlich
- filmscanners: Response from Nikon USA on ... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Response from Nikon USA... Bill Gass
- Re: filmscanners: Response from Nikon USA... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Response from Nikon USA... Bill Gass
- Re: filmscanners: Response from Nikon USA... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Response from Nikon USA... Julian Robinson
- Re: filmscanners: Response from Nikon USA... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Response from Nikon USA... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real... Robert Kehl
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real... Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real... Frank Paris
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real... Arthur Entlich