Bill Gass wrote: > Same reply I received. Interestingly, the next day and today there is no > evidence of the jaggies that were so obvious when I posted my query. It > is not the power since I have everything connected to a UPS with line > conditioning. > > Bill > It might be the power of suggestion? ;-) Or maybe Nikon has more power than you realized? ;-) Art
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Arthur Entlich
- filmscanners: Response from Nikon USA on jaggies Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Response from Nikon USA on jaggies Bill Gass
- Re: filmscanners: Response from Nikon USA on jaggies Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Response from Nikon USA on jaggies Bill Gass
- Re: filmscanners: Response from Nikon USA on jaggies Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Response from Nikon USA on jaggies Julian Robinson
- Re: filmscanners: Response from Nikon USA on jaggies Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Robert Kehl
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Frank Paris
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Derek Clarke
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Frank Paris
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Laurie Solomon
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Jim Snyder
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Frank Paris