Laurie Solomon wrote: > I never intended to write anything of the sort. The computer skipped some > characters in transmitting the message. It should have read: "you are still > more or less current and can afford...." Sorry about that. Was that Freudian web-slip? Art
- filmscanners: Vuescan s... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: OT: d... Mike Kersenbrock
- Re: filmscanners: OT: d... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: OT: d... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: OT: d... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: OT: d... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: OT: d... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: OT: d... Ian Jackson
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 rea... B.Rumary
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000... Laurie Solomon
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-... Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 an... Laurie Solomon
- RE: filmscanners: SS400... Hersch Nitikman
- RE: filmscanners: SS400... Laurie Solomon
- filmscanners: Typograph... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000... Michael Wilkinson
- triple chili, was filmscanners: ... Roman Kielich®
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Hart or Mary Jo Corbett