Laurie Solomon wrote: > Actually it was purely electronic and mechanical. I typed "current" in but > the computer only registered the first two and the last two characters. > When I sent the email the spell checker did not catch the word; Microsoft > obviously views it as a legitimate old Anglo-Saxon word. :-) WordPerfect has a number of different dictionary/spell check versions you can purchase, such as medical and legal. Maybe you got the "porno" version of the Microsoft spellcheck with your software package? ;-) Art
- Re: filmscanners: OT: d... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: OT: d... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: OT: d... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: OT: d... Ian Jackson
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 rea... B.Rumary
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-... Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: SS4000 an... Laurie Solomon
- RE: filmscanners: SS400... Hersch Nitikman
- RE: filmscanners: SS400... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: SS400... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000... Michael Wilkinson
- triple chili, was filmscanners: ... Roman Kielich®
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value? Hart or Mary Jo Corbett