On Sun, 25 Feb 2001 04:09:50 -0800 Arthur Entlich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > We do allow ourselves to exploit one another... there always appears to > be someone willing to undercut the last guy's bid, one way or another. <PLUG>Which is why all editorial photographers should be in EP (www.editorialphoto.com) or EPUK (www.epuk.org.uk)</PLUG> Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprint... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprint... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprint... Michael Moore
- Re: filmscanners: why bother professionally ?? Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: why bother professionally ?? Michael Moore
- Re: filmscanners: why bother professionally ?? Dicky
- Re: filmscanners: why bother professionally ?? Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: why bother professionally ?? Laurie Solomon
- RE: filmscanners: why bother professionally ?? Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: why bother professionally ?? Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: evolution (was Nikon 8000 ED or ... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: evolution (was Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid ... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: evolution (was Nikon 8000 ED or Pola... Michael Moore
- Re: filmscanners: evolution (was Nikon 8000 ED or ... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: evolution (was Nikon 8000 ED or ... Michael Moore
- filmscanners: Acer or Nikon? trs80
- filmscanners: Scan Dual II on Mac platform Berry Ives
- Re: filmscanners: Scan Dual II on Mac platform Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Scan Dual II on Mac platform Berry Ives
- Re: filmscanners: Scan Dual II on Mac platform Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Scan Dual II on Mac platform Berry Ives