On Sun, 25 Feb 2001 02:06:26 -0800 Arthur Entlich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Images in general are becoming more and more just so much "stuff" and > old stuff is being recycled. Exactly so. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprint... Dicky
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprint... Roman Kielich®
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprint... Michael Moore
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprint... Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprint... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprint... Dicky
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprint... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprint... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprint... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprint... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprint... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprint... Michael Moore
- Re: filmscanners: why bother professionally ?? Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: why bother professionally ?? Michael Moore
- Re: filmscanners: why bother professionally ?? Dicky
- Re: filmscanners: why bother professionally ?? Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: why bother professionally ?? Laurie Solomon
- RE: filmscanners: why bother professionally ?? Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: why bother professionally ?? Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: why bother professionally ?? Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: evolution (was Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid ... Tony Sleep