Oh, well. At least this is good for a laugh. Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dicky > Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 1:58 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: filmscanners: OT more copyright questions > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Laurie Solomon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 5:44 PM > Subject: RE: filmscanners: OT more copyright questions > > > Mr Solomon > > Will you kindly stick your views on property issues right up your prattish > arse. > > This group is not the place to discuss them and anyway you do not have the > slightest degree of expertise on the subject so bugger off or stick to > scanning. > > Yours in total animosity. > > Richard Corbett >
- Re: filmscanners: SCSI to 1394/fire... Richard N. Moyer
- Re: filmscanners: OT more copyright ques... Jim Snyder
- Re: filmscanners: OT more copyright... JimD
- filmscanners: Re: OT messages &... Chris McBrien
- Re: filmscanners: Re: OT messages &... Jim Snyder
- Re: filmscanners: OT more copyright questions soho
- RE: filmscanners: OT more copyright question... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: OT more copyright ques... Dicky
- Re: filmscanners: OT more copyright... Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: OT more copyright... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: OT more copyright... Frank Paris
- Re: filmscanners: OT more copyright questions Dicky
- Re: filmscanners: OT more copyright questions Terry Carroll
- Re: filmscanners: OT more copyright questions Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: OT more copyright questions Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: OT more copyright questions Derek Clarke
- RE: filmscanners: Jay Maisel Interview with Pictures and ... Laurie Solomon