On Sun, 25 Mar 2001 07:24:40 -0500 Chuck Phelps ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > (Those scans you get from > photographers arn't any good.) The printers like to scan off the Fuji > prints. No doubt. It just seems offensively ridiculous to have to degrade things by adding 2 extra generations just to keep them in the manner to which they are accustomed. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skir... Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: Repro house ... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house ... Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: Repro house ... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Repro house ... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishi... Richard
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishi... Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (... Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long) Chuck Phelps
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long) Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long) Michael Wilkinson
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long) Bill Ross