Laurie Solomon wrote: > > Hence, given the purpose that you would be using the inkjet print for, > archival quality is not a major significant factor as long as the damn thing > does not turn orange within a month or two; moreover, since there are few > other features other than a whiter base that you could obtain from using > Premium Glossy Photo Paper over the Epson Photo Paper when used with the > 1200, I do not think the Premium Glossy Photo Paper (EPGPP) would be of any > benefit to you. > One potential negative in this equation, at least in earlier manifestations of this paper, I found that the surface would "fracture" if the paper was flexed in a tight circular curve, looking a bit like the "crazing" or cracking of the glaze of an old teacup. (Something you Brits can certainly relate to.) ;-) Art
- Re: filmscanners:OT:Epson papers Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (lo... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing... Laurie Solomon
- RE: filmscanners: Repro house skirmi... Hersch Nitikman
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmi... Dave King
- RE: filmscanners: Repro house sk... Laurie Solomon
- RE: filmscanners: Repro house skirmi... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house sk... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house sk... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house sk... Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: Repro house skirmi... Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: Repro house sk... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house sk... Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: Repro house sk... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Repro house sk... Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing... Richard
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing... Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (lo... Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: Repro house skirmishing (long) Chuck Phelps