"Oostrom, Jerry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If ICE would remove these spots, which are likely in the film itself, well > then that is all the more reason to buy the 2740s. It would be nice though > if you would have an ICE' algorithm (FROSTY?) in which you could specify > which pixel colors should be regarded as dust. Although it would probably > work well on not too dense negatives only and not on dias. You could try the salt and pepper filter in Paintshop Pro 7. Rob
- Re: filmscanners: Acer Scanwit 2720s vs 2740s vs HP s... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Acer Scanwit 2720s vs 2740s vs HP s... Mark T.
- Re: filmscanners: Acer Scanwit 2720s vs 2740s vs... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- re: filmscanners: Acer Scanwit 2720s vs 2740s vs HP s... Alan Womack
- re: filmscanners: Acer Scanwit 2720s vs 2740s vs HP s... Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Acer Scanwit 2720s vs 2740s vs... Todd Radel
- Re: filmscanners: Acer Scanwit 2720s vs 2740... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Acer Scanwit 2720s vs ... Todd Radel
- Re: filmscanners: Acer Scanwit 2720s... Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: Acer Scanwit 2720s vs 2740s vs HP s... Oostrom, Jerry
- filmscanners: Canoscan 4000 Rob Geraghty
- filmscanners: Canoscan 4000 Charles Platt
- Re: filmscanners: Canoscan 4000 Michael Moore
- Re: filmscanners: Canoscan 4000 Charles Platt
- Re: filmscanners: Canoscan 4000 Richard
- Re: filmscanners: Canoscan 4000 Charles Platt
- RE: filmscanners: Acer Scanwit 2720s vs 2740s vs HP s... Oostrom, Jerry
- RE: filmscanners: Acer Scanwit 2720s vs 2740s vs... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Acer Scanwit 2720s vs 2740s vs... Arthur Entlich
- re: filmscanners: Acer Scanwit 2720s vs 2740s vs HP s... Richard Starr