RE: filmscanners: OT: photographing on the street

[Dave Buyens]

Art,
  You certainly do have a point.  For me, though, it's certainly not as much
profit as I'd like!
Dave

Arthur Entlich wrote:
> I've never quite understood why publishing an image in a newspaper is
> considered "not for profit"... does the name Randolph Hearst (and
> granddaughter Patti) and Conrad Black not ring any "top income bracket"
> bells? ;-)... Rosebud.
>
> (This is somewhat tongue in cheek, I do understand the concept of
> editorial images)