In a message dated 6/10/2001 4:13:40 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The T-2500 scan (agfsnipVS) is a bit softer and flatter than the LS-30
> scan (niksnipVS). After sharpening and correcting tone on both scans,
> I thought the T-2500 scan rendered image detail slightly better than
> the LS-30 (maybe), but these files not sent as Ed requested only the
> default result.
You need to show the .tif files, not the .jpg files. The .jpg files
are full of jpeg artifacts. It's best to put these on a web site
instead of e-mailing them to this list.
In spite of this, it appears clear that the T-2500 doesn't focus
as well as the Nikon scan, and this is most of the reason that
the dust spots are different.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
