In a message dated 6/10/2001 6:22:35 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The Agfa is definitely softer,
> no argument there, but when I apply unsharp masking to the Agfa scan
> on the order of 75%, 0.8 radius, 0 threshold to the Agfa scan, which
> is my normal amount to sharpen grain with the T-2500, it is about as
> sharp as the unsharpened Nikon scan.
Unsharp masking isn't a reasonable way to compare the scans, since
this doesn't get to the root of why there's a difference between the
results from the two scanners.
A good test would be to turn off "Device|Auto focus" and
manually vary the focus on the Nikon. This will give a good
indication of whether the clarity of the dust spots is related to
the focus of the scanner.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
