On Thu, 7 Jun 2001 10:20:40 -0400 Dave King ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > If the film > terms for the SS4000 didn't give you this, either the terms weren't > accurate, the scanner wasn't calibrated well, or your system's CM > wasn't set up correctly. This would be true of slide, but there's inescapabaly much more variability with colour neg. due to the nature of the film. And although I've not used a Leafscan, I bet what it got from colour neg was only approximate too. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and n... Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 ... Isaac Crawford
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan ... Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 ... Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 ... Dave King
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan ... Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan ... Dave King
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 ... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new n... Dave King
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and n... Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negat... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new n... Raphael Bustin
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative ... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative proil... Hemingway, David J
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative ... Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negat... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new n... Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and n... rafeb
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 ... Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and n... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 ... Dave King