On Thu, 7 Jun 2001 00:23:25 -0400 Austin Franklin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > ...but film > characteristic profiling is different than the "specific conditions" you > mentioned above, isn't it? Not for colour negs - the characteristics are annoyingly mutable, depending on exposure, processing etc. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan ... Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan ... Dave King
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 ... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new n... Dave King
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and n... Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negat... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new n... Raphael Bustin
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative ... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative proil... Hemingway, David J
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative ... Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negat... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new n... Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and n... rafeb
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 ... Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and n... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 ... Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan ... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan ... Michael Moore
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan ... Tony Sleep
- filmscanners: workflow Steve Greenbank
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative proil... Hemingway, David J