> >Interesting that NikonScan > >(3.1, at least) doesn't have them at all, yet > >does a pretty good job at inverting negatives > >and coming up with useful, believable images > >with different types of negative film. > > I find that somewhat more than interesting. If Nikonscan has no > profiles, how does it know where the startpoint is? This isn't > meant to be disrespectful--I'm truly curious. It might answer > some perplexing questions I've had for some time, now. The Leafscan never had any film profiles, and it's been the staple of high end scanners for over 10 years. What questions did you have?
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative... Lawrence Smith
- filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative pro... Johnny Deadman
- filmscanners: Scanner software (was Sprintsca... Roy Smyth
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new nega... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new nega... Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new ... Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative... tflash
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new nega... Lawrence Smith
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new nega... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative proile s... Lynn Allen
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative pro... Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative proile s... Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative proile s... Shough, Dean
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative proile s... Ramesh Kumar_C
- Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative proile s... IQ3D