At 05:08 PM 6/12/01 -0400, Dan wrote: >What are the best color and b&w films in terms of scanning? From what I've >read thus far, it sounds like Kodak Supra has a slight edge for color, and >the C41 processed films (XP2 super and T400CN) for b&w. Are there others? > >Also, if one is planning ultimately to scan and maintain files in digital >format (and print from there), are there any advantages left to shooting >transparencies as opposed to negatives--given that the latter has so much >more exposure latitude? Or does the finer resolution of slide film still >make this the preferred emulsion when scanning? Fuji Reala is beautiful. Kodak Royal Gold 100 isn't bad, either. But Supra (100) is my current favorite. rafe b.
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New ... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: ... Julian Robinson
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon perform... Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon perform... Arthur Entlich
- filmscanners: Was New Nikon performance, now dus... Isaac Crawford
- Re: filmscanners: Was New Nikon performance,... Dave King
- RE: filmscanners: Was New Nikon performance,... Dan Honemann
- Re: filmscanners: Was New Nikon performa... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Was New Nikon perf... Kevin Power
- Re: filmscanners: Was New Nikon perf... Edwin Eleazer
- filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Was New ... rafeb
- filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Was ... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: ... Raphael Bustin
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: ... Yuri J Sos
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: ... Raphael Bustin
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: ... Yuri J Sos
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: ... rafeb
- filmscanners: Superia vs Reala Tom Christiansen
- Re: filmscanners: Superia vs Reala Richard N. Moyer
- Re: filmscanners: Superia vs Reala Isaac Crawford
- Re: filmscanners: Superia vs Reala rafeb