I have been very pleased with the Supra 100 with my LS-30, and at $3.04 a 36 exp roll, an excellent buy. Edwin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Maris V. Lidaka, Sr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 9:56 PM Subject: Re: filmscanners: Was New Nikon performance, now dust > I tried Kodak Supra 400 and was disappointed - too much grain, probably > because it was the 400 speed. I have not tried the Supra 100.
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New ... Isaac Crawford
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New ... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: ... Julian Robinson
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon perform... Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon perform... Arthur Entlich
- filmscanners: Was New Nikon performance, now dus... Isaac Crawford
- Re: filmscanners: Was New Nikon performance,... Dave King
- RE: filmscanners: Was New Nikon performance,... Dan Honemann
- Re: filmscanners: Was New Nikon performa... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Was New Nikon perf... Kevin Power
- RE: filmscanners: Was New Nikon perf... Edwin Eleazer
- RE: filmscanners: Was New Nikon performa... rafeb
- filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Was ... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: ... Raphael Bustin
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: ... Yuri J Sos
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: ... Raphael Bustin
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: ... Yuri J Sos
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: ... rafeb
- filmscanners: Superia vs Reala Tom Christiansen
- Re: filmscanners: Superia vs Reala Richard N. Moyer
- Re: filmscanners: Superia vs Reala Isaac Crawford