On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:47:39 +1000 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rob=20Geraghty?= ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > I was under the impression that there was little if any > difference between the current generation Superia 100 > and Reala. When Fuji announced the extra colour layer, > it seemed to point to the same technology. Can anyone > confirm this? I may be hallucinating, but I have used both quite a lot and consider Reala negs lower contrast and more neutral on skin tone than Superia100. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- Re: filmscanners: RE: films... rafeb
- filmscanners: Superia vs Re... Tom Christiansen
- Re: filmscanners: Superia v... Richard N. Moyer
- Re: filmscanners: Superia v... Isaac Crawford
- Re: filmscanners: Superia v... rafeb
- Re: filmscanners: RE: films... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Films for scanning was Re: ... Rob Geraghty
- Re: Films for scanning was ... B.Rumary
- Re: filmscanners: =?iso-885... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: RE: films... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: RE: films... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New ... Gordon Tassi
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Niko... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon pe... Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: Nikon LS2000 problem David Hoffman
- Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance EdHamrick
- Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Julian Robinson
- Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance Steve Greenbank