On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 09:51:54 +1000 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rob=20Geraghty?= ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I'll definitely have to scan one of the frames > of Fuji 800 taken in full daylight ... >Clearly they are underexposed compared to > photos exposed in normal daylight. Best to rate at 640 IME, it helps keep grain under control, and cleans up the shadows appreciably. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- Re: filmscanners: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Films=20for=20scanning=20w... Tony Sleep
- filmscanners: Films for scanning Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Films for scanning David Corwin
- Re: filmscanners: Films for scanning rafeb
- filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Films for scan... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Films ... rafeb
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: F... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: F... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: films for scanning Tony Sleep
- filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: films for scan... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: films for scanning? Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: films for scanning? Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: films for scann... Tony Sleep
- filmscanners: films for scanning Rob Geraghty
- filmscanners: Diffused scanners... Marvin Demuth
- filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Diffused scann... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: films for scanning Tony Sleep