On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Tony Sleep wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 01:15:00 -0700 Karl Schulmeisters > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > Respectfully, many pros are switching to digital. > > For newspaper use it's standard now. But I was recently speaking to an AP > photographer who was grumbling that he has to try and shoot everything > twice now - on dig for the wire, and film for the magazine market which AP > are now trying to muscle in on. > > Regards > > Tony Sleep > http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner > info & comparisons > ____> Heraclites already proved you cannot photograph the same river twice.
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings stuart
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings RogerMillerPhoto
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Karl Schulmeisters
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Bob Shomler
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Karl Schulmeisters
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Walter Bushell
- RE: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings laurie
- RE: filmscanners: Digital Shortco... Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Isaac Crawford
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings RogerMillerPhoto
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Karl Schulmeisters
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Hersch Nitikman
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Isaac Crawford