[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Walter Bushell) wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Tony Sleep wrote: > > > On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 01:15:00 -0700 Karl Schulmeisters > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > Respectfully, many pros are switching to digital. > > > > For newspaper use it's standard now. But I was recently speaking to > > an AP > > photographer who was grumbling that he has to try and shoot everything > > twice now - on dig for the wire, and film for the magazine market > > which AP > > are now trying to muscle in on. > > > > Regards > > > > Tony Sleep > > http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner > > info & comparisons > > > > ____> Heraclites already proved you cannot photograph the same river > twice. > > I have this image of some poor AP sports guy having to hold a Heath Robinson bracket with a D30, EOS1v and two 300mm f/2.8s...
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings RogerMillerPhoto
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Karl Schulmeisters
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Bob Shomler
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Karl Schulmeisters
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Walter Bushell
- RE: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings laurie
- RE: filmscanners: Digital Shortco... Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Isaac Crawford
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings RogerMillerPhoto
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Karl Schulmeisters
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Hersch Nitikman
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Isaac Crawford
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Hersch Nitikman
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortco... Derek Clarke