Tomasz wrote: >Most of you use ink-jet printers for the output of your pictures. >Why don't you use digital minilabs, like Fuji Frontier? 1) Availability. I don't know of anywhere near me that has one 2) Cost. I can do A3 prints cheaper on my 1160 3) Detail. I can get more information onto the paper with an inkjet than with a minilab. The printer isn't as limited in the range of values or manipulations that are possible. 4) Control. As others have mentioned, the inkjet allows me to decide how I want the print to be. Otherwise the technician at the lab decides. Having said all that, archival quality on Crystal Archive would be nice. I don't have a CIS and pigmented inks. Rob Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wordweb.com
- filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? Tomasz Zakrzewski
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? rafeb
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: why not digi... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? Gordon Tassi
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minila... Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minila... Walter Bushell
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? Mikael Risedal
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? Lynn Allen