> Tomasz wrote: > >Most of you use ink-jet printers for the output of your pictures. > >Why don't you use digital minilabs, like Fuji Frontier? Next question on this topic - Have any of you printing with Epson photo printers resorted to the Frontier printer to get a good B&W print? I have been doing a few restorations and hate being limited to only toned prints, just because my 1270 can't produce a true grayscale image. I'll be buying another system (printer, CFS, hex-tone inks) before too long, but right now I would be willing to take any B&W work out and have it printed. I guess I would like to know how the Frontier or others compare to an Epson print with the same file?? That way I could do all of my tweaking and test prints at home, then take the file to be printed when satisfied with the results. --James Hill
- filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? Tomasz Zakrzewski
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? rafeb
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: why not digital ... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? James Hill
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? Dave King
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? Gordon Tassi
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minila... Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minila... Walter Bushell
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? Mikael Risedal
- Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs? Lynn Allen