I was trying to catch up by reading messages backwards, so didn't see Rob's original post. I think this answers my question - I should not bother with more than 512MB until I move up from Win98. Still not sure about what "resources" actually covers though. Like you Rob I would be using Win2000 today if it didn't mean I'd have to upgrade half my existing software and maybe hardware. Julian Julian Robinson in usually sunny, smog free Canberra, Australia
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Laurie Solomon
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windo... Steve Greenbank
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Jawed Ashraf
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windo... LAURIE SOLOMON
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Steve Greenbank
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Julian Robinson
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Raphael Bustin
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows LAURIE SOLOMON
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Steve Greenbank
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows B. Twieg
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Laurie Solomon
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Dana Trout
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Rob Geraghty