On Thu, 26 Jul 2001 13:03:17 -0500 Laurie Solomon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I noticed in both systems that since > the addition of the RAM the Windows resources meter shows proportionately > less system resources being used than previously (ie., more system's > resources available), which is one thing which I take as an indication > that > the additional RAM above 512 is being taken into account. AIUI Resources meter shows only useage of 3 internal OS stacks which are of fixed size (System, User, GDI) and don't vary with RAM installed. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info & comparisons
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Julian Robinson
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Raphael Bustin
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows LAURIE SOLOMON
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Steve Greenbank
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows B. Twieg
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Laurie Solomon
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Dana Trout
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Rob Geraghty
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windo... LAURIE SOLOMON
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windo... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Pat Perez
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windo... LAURIE SOLOMON
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows Steve Greenbank