"Steve Greenbank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Further, in my experience of Win NT 4.0 the claimed reliability of desktop > PC's is a fallacy. At work I have used around a dozen PC's and all have been > much less reliable than my home PCs on Win9x. Gah. I use NT 4.0 SP6a on my computer at work and it is *far* more stable than my home PC which runs Win98SE. Obscanning - I wonder how many of those using Windows with filmscanners are running NT or Win2K? Rob PS I have upgraded my computer to a Celeron 850 and 512MB RAM from a Celeron 533 with 288MB RAM. Using Vuescan and PSP is definitely significantly faster.
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memo... Tony Sleep
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and... LAURIE SOLOMON
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memo... Raphael Bustin
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memo... Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and... LAURIE SOLOMON
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memo... Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and... Jawed Ashraf
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and... LAURIE SOLOMON
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memo... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and... Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memo... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and... Mark Edmonds
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and... Stan McQueen
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and... Jim Snyder
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memo... Lynn Allen
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and... Sumtingwong
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memo... Dana Trout
- RE: filmscanners: Scanning and... Jawed Ashraf
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and... geoff murray
- Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memo... Steve Greenbank