Have you tried artificially extending the dynamic range by scanning each 
slide with two different exposures and combining the results?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anthony Atkielski) wrote:

> Mike writes:
> 
> > Is this true?
> 
> That has been my understanding from reviews I've read.
> 
> > I was under the impression from reviews the
> > dynamic range of the SS4000 was almost the
> > same as the LS4000 and IV.
> 
> Almost isn't good enough when you are scanning slides.  I cannot afford 
> to
> sacrifice anything with respect to dynamic range; even the current Nikon
> scanners don't have enough of it, but they seem to be the best 
> available.
> 
> 

Reply via email to