Have you tried artificially extending the dynamic range by scanning each slide with two different exposures and combining the results? [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anthony Atkielski) wrote: > Mike writes: > > > Is this true? > > That has been my understanding from reviews I've read. > > > I was under the impression from reviews the > > dynamic range of the SS4000 was almost the > > same as the LS4000 and IV. > > Almost isn't good enough when you are scanning slides. I cannot afford > to > sacrifice anything with respect to dynamic range; even the current Nikon > scanners don't have enough of it, but they seem to be the best > available. > >
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Pat Perez
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! JFMahony91
- RE: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Moreno Polloni
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Anthony Atkielski
- RE: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Moreno Polloni
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Anthony Atkielski
- RE: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Jawed Ashraf
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Peter Marquis-Kyle
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! JFMahony91
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! JFMahony91
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! JFMahony91