Derek writes: > Have you tried artificially extending the dynamic > range by scanning each slide with two different > exposures and combining the results? No, mainly because of the problems with misregistration of pixels. Additionally, the gain would be very small compared to the overhead of scanning twice. It already takes me from 3-10 minutes per slide, for the scan and Photoshop adjustments.
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! JFMahony91
- RE: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Moreno Polloni
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Anthony Atkielski
- RE: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Derek Clarke
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Moreno Polloni
- RE: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Anthony Atkielski
- RE: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Jawed Ashraf
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Peter Marquis-Kyle
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! JFMahony91
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! JFMahony91
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! JFMahony91
- Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! Anthony Atkielski