> Modern printers are definitely approaching "fine" resolutions. > If you put > criteria like is common to "fine" B/W prints on today's printers > ... say, 7 > lines/mm, ... which equates to ~180 pixel pairs per inch, ... then you > realize there isn't much point in sending finer than 300 pixels/in > resolutions to your printer. > > shAf :o) Is this blanket misstatement day ;-) That depends on the printer driver. The Piezography driver can use (meaning you get improved results from) data up to around 720 pixels/inch. It really diminishes after 420 though, at least for my images.
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Steve Greenbank
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Gordon Potter
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Shough, Dean
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Shough, Dean
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Shough, Dean
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReS... Eugene A La Lancette PhD MD
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? shAf
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Mark T.
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Shough, Dean
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? shAf
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Jack Phipps
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Jack Phipps
- Re: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? RogerMillerPhoto
- Re: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? David