> > ... > > The Piezography driver can use (meaning you get > > improved results from) data up to around 720 pixels/inch. > > It really diminishes after 420 though, ... > > Diminishes according to what? ... "normal" viewing distances. Do YOU have Piezography inks and the driver? Have you experimented to see what looks best?
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Shough, Dean
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Shough, Dean
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReS... Eugene A La Lancette PhD MD
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? shAf
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Mark T.
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Shough, Dean
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? shAf
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Jack Phipps
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Austin Franklin
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Jack Phipps
- Re: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? RogerMillerPhoto
- Re: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? David
- Re: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReS... Larry Berman
- RE: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? LAURIE SOLOMON
- Re: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? Arthur Entlich
- filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: ReSize, R... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: ReSize, ReSample or ReScan ? David