The REAL point of getting a 24x36 chip is to make your 35mm lenses be what they're supposed to be. Not some inbetween angle of view as the digital cameras of today are. -- John Chicago, IL =========== on 9/16/01 9:09 AM, Mikael Risedal at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The resolution from 24 x 36 chip is better than Nikon D1X but not > significant much better.
- filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Mikael Risedal
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Mark T.
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X John Straus
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Mikael Risedal
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X John Straus
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Pat Perez
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X shAf
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Anthony Atkielski
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Paul Chefurka
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Robert Meier
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X bob geoghegan
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Tom Scales
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Steve Greenbank