Pat writes: > Keep in mind that just because a sensor is smaller > than 24x36mm doesn't make your lenses obsolete. > It makes them telephoto ... Same thing. I don't need a closet full of telephoto lenses. > If I were a sports or nature photographer, I > think I'd be in hog heaven with the magnification > factor. I'm not, so it's lots of lenses out the window unless I can find a camera that is 24x36. I'll wait. Decent digital cameras still cost way too much, anyway.
- filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Mikael Risedal
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Mark T.
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X John Straus
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Mikael Risedal
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X John Straus
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Pat Perez
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X shAf
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Anthony Atkielski
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Paul Chefurka
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Robert Meier
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X bob geoghegan
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Tom Scales
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Mikael Risedal
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Mikael Risedal
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Mikael Risedal